ngl
IFFY

48 / 100

$GF

0xfed6…62b28a· Robinhood Chain

ngl, not gonna lie

The staking site loads, but the 'reserve' claim is unproven and one wallet holds 54% of the supply.

GongFu is a real-looking staking site where you lock GF for a term. The position dialog opens, but the test wallet held 0 GF, so no deposit or signature request was reached and rewards could not be checked. The dev bought 50% at launch and sent it to one wallet that still holds 54%, and nothing shows that wallet is the locked reserve the project describes. No other bundle buys, and this is the dev's first coin.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 1 h ago

Red flags2

  • Half the supply sits in one unproven wallet

    The dev bought 50% in the launch transaction and sent it to 0x05…73d2, which still holds 54%. It is not a known lock or burn, so the 'shared reserve' claim is not confirmed.

    devlaunchtransferreceived
  • Supply is concentrated

    The top 10 wallets hold 68%, and the largest single wallet holds 54%. That is heavy concentration even without counting pools.

    54%8.2%1.0%0.8%

Watch out3

  • Staking product not seen working end to end

    The 'New position' dialog opened with amount and term fields. The wallet connect in the dialog did not show a connected state, and the approve button stayed disabled because the test wallet held 0 GF.

    screenshotscreenshotscreenshot
  • 'No owner, no admin' and 'unbreakable' claims unverified

    Nothing in the facts shows the contract's ownership, upgradeability, or verification status, so the key trust claims are unbacked.

    claim sourcedevtransferreceived
  • Small, fairly new X account

    @gongfufinance is 40 days old with 60 followers and about 12 likes per post. Its bio matches the site's 'no owner' pitch, and the site links back to it. Nothing impersonates or looks bought.

    @gongfufinance@gongfufinance@gongfufinance@gongfufinance

Checks out1

  • Clean launch block and first coin

    No one other than the dev bought in the launch block, and this dev has no earlier launches. The dev wallet holds none of the tokens.

    launchdev

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

  • Product · Does it exist and work?

    A real staking interface exists, but no deposit or reward could be tested because the wallet held no GF.

  • Claims · Are its claims backed?

    The reserve, no-admin and 80% reward claims are unbacked or untested.

  • On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet

    The launch block is clean, but one wallet fed by the dev holds 54% and the top 10 hold 68%.

  • Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory

    First coin from this dev with a small but real X presence and a site linked back; no track record.

Cross-checked

A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.

  • AnsweredOn chain

    One wallet holds 54% of supply and was funded by the dev's 50% launch buy, which matches the level-0 'one funder controls the supply' condition, not level 1.

    ngl: The facts say the 54% wallet may be a team, marketing or lock-contract wallet and has not sold, so they do not show that one funder controls the supply, and the clean launch block and lack of other bundle buys fit level 1.

ngl has seen this before

ngl has checked 171 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

Ask the agent

Anything about $GF. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.

Hands-on tests

  • WorksOpen main product (Start) and position dialog

    Position dialog opens with amount and term

    What it did:
    Clicked Start, opened the 'New position' dialog, entered 0.01 GF, kept 7D term.
    What the site showed:
    Dialog 'Choose a GF amount and an unlocked term.' with Maximum reward 'up to 0 GF (1.5%) · may be lower'; wallet holds 0 GF.
    Screenshot: Position dialog opens with amount and term
  • BrokenConnect wallet inside position dialog

    Wallet connect in dialog does not connect

    What it did:
    Clicked 'Connect wallet' then 'MetaMask installed' in the dialog.
    What the site showed:
    No wallet connection visible in the dialog afterwards; the page showed no connected state.
    Screenshot: Wallet connect in dialog does not connect
  • Couldn’t testApprove & create position (wallet signature request)

    Blocked: wallet holds 0 GF, button disabled

    What it did:
    Tried clicking 'Approve & create position' several times; left inviter field empty then pasted 0x0000000000000000000000000000 (invalid, truncated address).
    What the site showed:
    Button stays disabled with alert 'Not enough GF in your wallet: it holds 0 GF. Lower the amount or buy more GF first.' Clicks timed out.
    Screenshot: Blocked: wallet holds 0 GF, button disabled
  • WorksInviter address field

    Inviter field accepts an address

    What it did:
    Typed an inviter address into 'Different inviter? Paste their address' and clicked 'Use this address'.
    What the site showed:
    Field accepted text; the first attempt with 0x0000...0001 was pre-filled. Second attempt with a truncated address was not a complete address.
    Screenshot: Inviter field accepts an address
New checkBrowse all checks