The buy works, but the site is the same one used by two coins ngl already called RUG.

The coin page on otcdesks.cash builds a real Jupiter swap that would go through, so trading itself works. The site is shared with $OS and $DOPE, two coins ngl called RUG because their holder-reward promises were unbacked. This coin's page shows large holder-reward figures that could not be verified. A bundle took 19% in the launch block and sold all of it.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 2 h ago

Red flags1

Same site as two coins ngl called RUG
otcdesks.cash is also the website of $OS (RUG 30/100) and $DOPE (RUG 33/100). Both were flagged for unbacked holder rewards, and the site template is reused across coins.
$OS on ngl $DOPE on ngl

Watch out4

Holder-reward figures are unverified
The page shows figures like 'Earned, all in 591.38 SOL'. No on-chain product or wallet backs them, and the same pitch was found unbacked on the sibling coins.
page $OS on ngl $DOPE on ngl
Launch-block bundle took 19% and sold out
3 wallets bought 19% of the supply in the launch block and have sold all of it. That is usually the dev buying with extra wallets, and it means those holders cashed out.
launch xHT3…zeqz 9Yzs…y9yo vv4F…fEJQ
Thin, small X account
The dev's X account has 318 followers and about 1 like per post. Its followers are not fake. The CA is posted by 15 accounts, and one of those mentions scam or rug.
@Devorskiiiiii @Devorskiiiiii @Devorskiiiiii @Devorskiiiiii
New domain that links back to the coin
The domain is 58 days old. The site shows the correct CA and links to the dev's X.
registration page first screen

Checks out2

Buy flow builds a transaction that would succeed
With 0.01 SOL entered, the site built a Jupiter-routed swap quote and asked the wallet to sign. Simulation says it would go through. This is a plain swap, not a product of its own.
wallet requestscreenshot
Current holder spread looks healthy
The top 10 wallets hold 16% and the largest holds 2.5%. The dev holds no tokens, and creator fees go 100% to one locked address.
2.5%2.3%1.9%1.8%

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

Product · Does it exist and work?
A swap works up to the signature step, but the site has no product of its own, and the holder-reward feature was not verified.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
The coin made no claims of its own, and the reward figures on the site are unbacked, as they were on the sibling coins.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
Holders are spread out and the dev holds nothing, but a launch bundle of 19% sold out.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
The site is shared with two coins ngl called RUG, which ties this coin to a repeated pattern.

ngl has seen this before

Out of 195 coins ngl checked, 2 are tied to this one. What ngl said about them:

Ask the agent

Anything about $McRib. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.

Hands-on tests

WorksConnecting Phantom wallet on coin page
Phantom wallet connects to the coin page
What it did:
Clicked 'Connect wallet', then 'PhantomInstalled' to connect the test wallet
What the site showed:
Wallet connected; header shows 57V5…uxp8
WorksBuy $McRib trade flow to wallet signature
Buy reaches the wallet signature request
What it did:
Entered 0.01 in the SOL amount field and clicked 'Buy $McRib' (twice)
What the site showed:
Wallet request: Associated Token, 0.01 SOL 57V5…uxp8 → 2UPt…csZg, Token, Associated Token. ngl refused it after simulating; the site then showed 'Cancelled in wallet.' Quote: 3,062.32 $McRib, routed by Jupiter at 0.5% slippage