The mint works and the dev burned supply, but the AI trading agent claims could not be confirmed.

✕Red flags0

No red flags found.

!Watch out4

• AI agent trading is not verified

  The site shows a live feed of agent trades and a profit ranking, but nothing checked that these are real on-chain trades or agent wallets. This is the core of the pitch.

  claim source

• Starter fund and awakening payout untested

  The mint simulation passed, but nothing shows the half-of-mint fund split or the 0.01 ETH awakening payout.

  wallet request

• 30 snipers in the first two seconds

  Thirty wallets bought within about two seconds of launch, which points to bots or a prepared group. No other buys landed in the launch block besides the dev's.

  0xe5…e044launch

• Young, small X account

  The X account is 18 days old with 220 followers and about 12 likes per post. The sampled followers look like real accounts.

  @trenchersio@trenchersio@trenchersio@trenchersio

✓Checks out4

• Mint flow builds a real transaction

  After connecting a wallet and pressing 'Mint 1 for 0.02 ETH', the site built a transaction on chain 4663 that ngl's simulation says would succeed. The price matches the claim.

  wallet requestscreenshot

• Dev burned 9.4% and has not sold

  The dev sent 9.4% of supply to the burn address and has sold 0% since launch. It holds only 0.1% now, after buying 7.4% back.

  devtransferburn

• Holders fairly spread out

  The top 10 wallets hold 24% and the largest holds 8.2%, excluding pools and burns. That is not heavily concentrated.

  8.2%2.5%1.8%1.8%

• Active code and consistent site

  The GitHub repo has 244 commits from one contributor, includes Solidity, and was pushed to 8 hours ago. The site shows the correct contract address and links the project's X account.

  trenchersio/trencherspagefirst screen