45 / 100
$SHUNT
0x7e51…b1c4d6· Robinhood Chain
ngl, not gonna lie
A real-looking scanner site and repo exist, but the agent never saw the scanner or paper desk produce a result.
The site, X account and a 78-commit GitHub repo line up with the coin, and the dev bought little, sold nothing and burned some supply. But the browser agent's tests recorded nothing, so the scanner and paper desk were never seen working. One wallet holds 59% of the supply and the top 10 hold 80%, which is a risk whatever the product does.
Red flags1
Watch out4
Scanner and paper desk not seen working
The agent tried the ticket checker and the paper desk, but no test results were recorded. The main claims, seven checks, one verdict and a paper desk, are untested.
claim sourceshuntdesk/shuntdeskOpen source repo exists but is young
The repo has 78 commits, 213 files and a push 5 hours ago. It has one contributor and no stars, and it was created around the launch.
shuntdesk/shuntdeskNew domain, no history with ngl
The domain is 9 days old, and ngl has not seen this dev, site or X account in 177 earlier checks. There is no track record either way.
registrationMarket is tiny
Liquidity is about $58 and 24h volume is about $34, so the coin is practically untradeable.
$SHUNTlaunch
Checks out2
Clean launch block, dev not holding
Nobody but the dev bought in the launch block. The dev bought 2.0%, holds none now and burned 6.3% of supply.
launchdevtransferburnSite and X match the coin
The site lists this exact contract and links to @shuntdesk. The X account is 8 days old with 149 followers and 192 posts.
pagefirst screen@shuntdesk
How ngl got here
What the call rests on
Product · Does it exist and work?
A site and an active repo exist, but no test of the scanner or the desk was recorded.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
Only the repo and the contract address are backed; the core product claims are untested.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
The launch was clean and the dev holds nothing, but one wallet holds 59% and the top 10 hold 80%.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
There is a real, active X account and repo, but they are new and ngl has no history on this dev.
Cross-checked
A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.
AnsweredOn chain
One wallet holds 59% of supply, which is a single holder controlling the supply, the level-0 condition. The judge rated it 1.
ngl: The facts show the largest wallet holds 59% but not that it is the dev or linked to the dev (the dev holds nothing), and the launch block was clean, so a level 1 rating for concentration risk is fair rather than level 0.
ngl has seen this before
ngl has checked 177 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

