ngl
IFFY

55 / 100

↓ 3 since last

$RAETO

0x72be…14533c· Robinhood ChainAll 2 checks

ngl, not gonna lie

A real-looking AI-credits app, but this time the sign-in failed and its core claims are still unproven.

Raeto has a full site with a dashboard, docs and a real X presence, and the token contract is now verified with no owner. The agent's wallet sign-in did not complete this time, so deposits and credit purchases could not be tried. None of the main claims (Morpho vaults, AI credits, 1:1 rCREDIT backing, 400+ models) were confirmed. The launch was clean and the dev holds nothing, but the dev has two earlier coins that faded.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 3 h ago

Since the last check

The last check, 6 days ago: IFFY 58. This one: IFFY 55. See that check

  • ↓

    Wallet sign-in broke

    Before, the test wallet signed the sign-in message; now the MetaMask sign-in shows no signature request and the page stays in preview.

  • ↓

    Market cap more than halved

    Market cap was about $1.38M and is now about $623K.

  • ↓

    Liquidity fell by over a third

    Liquidity was about $112K and is now about $73K.

  • ↑

    Contract source is now verified

    Before, the token contract source was not verified; now it is verified and has no owner, so its rules can't be changed.

MeasuredThenNow
Market cap$1.4M$623.1k
Liquidity$112.2k$72.7k
Holders1,0701,149
Top 10 holders31.0 %37.0 %
X followers1,0241,308

Red flags0

No red flags found.

Watch out5

  • Wallet sign-in did not complete

    The agent tried MetaMask several times. The page stayed in preview and no signature request appeared, so the main flow was blocked. Last check, sign-in worked up to the wallet, so this is a regression, though it may be a test-wallet issue.

    screenshot
  • Core claims untested

    Morpho lending, interest turned into AI credits, 1:1 rCREDIT backing and the 400+ model router could not be checked. Buying credits was blocked behind sign-in.

    screenshotscreenshot
  • Dev has two earlier coins that faded

    Both trade below $6K market cap. This is a mild warning about the dev's track record.

    dev$?$?
  • Placeholder

    screenshot
  • Young but real-looking social presence

    The X account is 15 days old with 1,308 followers, and none of the sampled followers are empty accounts. The domain is 16 days old and links back to the X account. ngl has not seen this dev or site before.

    @RaetoCCregistrationpage

Checks out2

  • Token contract is verified with no owner

    The source is verified and nobody can change its rules. This is a good sign, but it only covers the $RAETO token, not rCREDIT or the vaults.

    token
  • Clean launch, dev holds nothing

    Nobody else bought in the launch block, and the dev wallet holds no tokens. The top 10 wallets hold 37%, a count that includes pools and lockers.

    launchdevtoken

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

  • Product · Does it exist and work?

    A real-looking app exists, but sign-in failed and the main feature was not seen working.

  • Claims · Are its claims backed?

    The rubric puts 'untested' at level 2, not 1. Nothing contradicts the claims, and the sign-in failure is an untested gap, not evidence against them.

  • On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet

    Clean launch block, dev holds nothing and the contract has no owner; the top-holder split is not fully visible.

  • Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory

    There is a real X presence with real followers, but the dev has two faded earlier coins and no track record.

Cross-checked

A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.

  • AcceptedClaims

    The rubric puts 'untested' at level 2, not 1. Nothing contradicts the claims, and the sign-in failure is an untested gap, not evidence against them.

ngl has seen this before

ngl has checked 211 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

Ask the agent

Anything about $RAETO. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.

Hands-on tests

  • BrokenSign-in with test wallet (MetaMask)

    Wallet sign-in never completes; stays in preview

    What it did:
    Clicked 'Sign in', then 'Continue with a wallet', then 'MetaMask'; later retried 'Sign in' and 'MetaMask' from the open dialog.
    What the site showed:
    The page kept showing 'You're viewing a preview.' and the top-right button still read 'Sign in'. No wallet signature request appeared.
    Screenshot: Wallet sign-in never completes; stays in preview
  • Couldn’t testBuy credits (Credits worth form)

    Buy credits needs sign-in first

    What it did:
    Left the default amount 20 in 'Credits worth' and pressed the 'Sign in to buy' button.
    What the site showed:
    The button reads 'Sign in to buy' and was not progressed because the user is not signed in.
    Screenshot: Buy credits needs sign-in first
New checkBrowse all checks