ngl
IFFY

52 / 100

$TETRA

0x7e18…45e1c9· Robinhood Chain

ngl, not gonna lie

The buy flow works, but the reserve backing is unproven and one wallet holds 47% of the supply.

The TETRA contract is verified with no owner, and the site's Buy flow produced a transaction that would go through. Nothing checked the stocks, gold, oil and ETH reserve behind the pitch, and the claimed audit has no evidence. The dev bought 81% at launch and now holds nothing, and holders are concentrated.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 2 h ago

Red flags1

  • Supply is concentrated

    The top 10 wallets hold 55% of the supply and the largest single wallet holds 47%. A large sale by that wallet could crash the price.

    47%1.2%1.0%1.0%

Watch out5

  • Reserve backing not verified

    No fact checks the stocks, gold, oil and ETH holdings or the claimed $12,916 reserve. The central claim stays untested.

    claim sourcetokenscreenshot
  • Dev bought 81% at launch and holds none now

    The dev bought 81% in the token-creation transaction and now holds nothing. About 6% went to seven wallets that passed it on, with no direct sale seen.

    devlaunchtransferreceived
  • Audit claim has no evidence, burn stat is off

    No audit by 'Serialized' could be found. The site states the burn as 4.03% of 10M, but it is 3.14% of the original 12.8M supply.

    claim sourcetokenburned to 0x0
  • Some wallet-connect problems on the site

    The dialog's Connect wallet button was disabled, and the USDG path showed zero balance and a disabled button. Buying with ETH worked.

    screenshotscreenshot
  • Young project, small but real social presence

    The domain is 3 days old and the X account is 2 months old with 1,294 followers, none of the sampled ones empty. Posts get about 4 likes, and ngl has no earlier record of this dev.

    registration@Tetravaultxyz@Tetravaultxyz@Tetravaultxyz

Checks out2

  • Buy flow reaches a working transaction

    With Pay ETH selected, the site asked the wallet to sign a 0.01 ETH transaction to its contract. ngl simulated it and it would succeed, with a quote of 4,214.5 TETRA.

    wallet requestscreenshot
  • Contract is verified with no owner

    The VaultToken source is verified and nobody can change its rules. Burns through the contract are real: 403,207 TETRA so far.

    tokenburned to 0x0

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

  • Product · Does it exist and work?

    The main Buy feature reaches a wallet transaction that simulates successfully, which is the level-3 bar. The unseen reserve is a claims question, not a product one.

  • Claims · Are its claims backed?

    Contract rules are backed, but reserve and audit claims are unbacked and the burn stat is wrong.

  • On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet

    The dev bought 81% at launch and holds none now, and one wallet holds 47%.

  • Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory

    There is a real X account with genuine-looking followers, but the dev is new to ngl and has little history.

Cross-checked

A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.

  • AcceptedProduct

    The main Buy feature reaches a wallet transaction that simulates successfully, which is the level-3 bar. The unseen reserve is a claims question, not a product one.

  • AnsweredClaims

    The site's burn stat is contradicted by the supply data, and that is a checkable headline number, not a minor wording issue.

    ngl: The burned count matches the chain data and only the percentage basis is wrong (3.14% vs 4.03%), so this is a real but modest misstatement, not a fabricated number.

ngl has seen this before

ngl has checked 167 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

Ask the agent

Anything about $TETRA. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.

Hands-on tests

  • WorksBuy TETRA (Spot instrument) via Pay ETH

    Buy reaches the wallet transaction request

    What it did:
    Opened the Nº 01 · Spot BUY instrument, entered 0.01 in the ETH amount field, selected Pay ETH, pressed Buy with slippage 1%.
    What the site showed:
    The site asked the test wallet to sign a transaction to 0x1F8aC7684A0164780dDeEAf58e351C15AF92fEeB, value 0.01, call 0x42e42b2b on chain 4663. ngl ran it without sending and refused; the dialog then showed 'Cancelled in the wallet.' Quote shown: 4,214.5 TETRA, all-in $1.42.
    Screenshot: Buy reaches the wallet transaction request
  • BrokenBuy TETRA via Pay USDG / wallet connect in buy dialog

    Connect wallet CTA disabled in buy dialog with USDG

    What it did:
    Filled 0.01 in the amount field and clicked 'Connect wallet' in the buy dialog; then retried and clicked 'Pay USDG'.
    What the site showed:
    'Connect wallet' button was disabled; with USDG selected the balance showed 0 and the CTA stayed disabled 'Connect wallet'.
    Screenshot: Connect wallet CTA disabled in buy dialog with USDG
  • BrokenWallet sign-in from the buy dialog

    Connect wallet button in dialog unclickable

    What it did:
    Clicked 'Connect wallet' in the buy dialog twice.
    What the site showed:
    Clicks timed out; button appeared disabled. Header wallet button showed 0xa954…d14a already connected.
    Screenshot: Connect wallet button in dialog unclickable
New checkBrowse all checks