55 / 100
$SHIP
WPQCYW…bmdYB8· Solana
ngl, not gonna lie
The launchpad site works up to the wallet step, but its program is barely used and a launch bundle dumped 56%.
The launch form accepts input and connects a wallet. It builds a small transaction that would go through, apparently for the Arweave upload fee. Its own program is only days old and barely used, and the roadmap milestones are not yet due. A bundle took 56% of supply in the launch block and sold all of it, and the market cap is far below its peak. The dev is clean: first launch, holds nothing, burned 1.3% and locked 4%.
Checked 2 h ago
Red flags0
No red flags found.
Watch out5
Own program is new and barely used
The program linked from the site was deployed 14 days ago, is upgradeable, and had 4 transactions in the last 7 days. So there is little evidence of real launches happening through it.
programupgrade authorityLaunch-block bundle took 56% and sold out
36 wallets bought 56% of supply in the launch block, and all of it is sold. This likely explains the fall from a very high peak market cap to about $46K.
launchDMdR…x6EQ7FzL…h9P74z42…dnrMWallet request is tiny, not a real drain
The site asked to move 0.000002408 SOL, which matches the Arweave upload payment step. The automated 'draining' flag fits any transfer, and the amount is negligible. The destination wallet was not checked further.
wallet requestreceiverSite and X are consistent, but both are new
The site shows the CA and links to the coin's X account. The domain is 20 days old and the account is 19 days old with 317 followers. Sampled followers look real.
pagefirst screenregistration@LaunchWithShipCreator fees go to a different wallet
Creator fees are paid to a wallet other than the dev's. That fits the milestone-vault concept but was not confirmed.
fee recipient
Checks out3
Launch flow reaches a wallet signature
The agent connected Phantom, filled the form, uploaded an image and pressed Sign and launch. The site built a transaction that would go through; the test wallet refused it. The launch itself was never completed.
screenshotscreenshotscreenshotDev looks clean
This is the dev's first coin. The dev holds 0%, burned 1.3% and locked 4.0% in Jupiter Lock. Selling was negligible.
devtransferburntransferHolders are fairly spread out
The top 10 wallets hold 27% and the largest holds 3.9%. There were 187 holders.
3.9%3.2%3.0%2.7%
Ask the agent
Anything about $SHIP. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.
Hands-on tests
Couldn’t testLaunching a coin (main flow)
Launch reaches wallet signature, refused by test wallet
- What it did:
- Opened /launch, connected Phantom, filled Name 'Test Coin', Ticker 'TEST', Description 'Test only', Website https://example.com, X https://x.com/example, GitHub https://github.com/example, milestone 'Test milestone', amount 0.01, date 2027-06-01, uploaded test PNG as image, clicked Review launch, then Sign and launch.
- What the site showed:
- The site asked the wallet to sign a transaction of 0.000002408 SOL (57V5…uxp8 → 9NER…jWsz). ngl's test wallet recorded it and refused; the dialog then showed 'You rejected the request in your wallet. Nothing was sent.' Step 1 'Upload image and metadata to Arweave' marked Failed ('Approve the Arweave payment in your wallet'). Try again produced the same wallet request and the same refusal.
WorksImage upload
Image upload accepted by launch form
- What it did:
- Uploaded the 512x512 test PNG via the Image picker on the launch form.
- What the site showed:
- The form accepted it and showed 'test-coin.png, 5 KB'.
WorksWallet connection (Phantom)
Phantom connects to launch form
- What it did:
- Clicked Connect wallet, then the Phantom option.
- What the site showed:
- Wallet connected; header shows 57V5…uxp8.
