78 / 100
↑ 8 since last$NGL
0x3c8e…191111· Robinhood ChainAll 20 checks
ngl, not gonna lie
The checker works and returns full reports, and the dev launched cleanly, but the token tiers are untested.
The ngl site returned a full verdict report with evidence when the agent checked the Bonk address, so the main product works. The launch was clean: no other buys in the launch block, wide holder spread, and the dev burned 11% and holds nothing. The domain and X account are new and small, and the check limits, token tiers and radar coverage were not confirmed.
Since the last check
The last check, 2 days ago: LEGIT 70. This one: LEGIT 78. See that check
- ↑
The coin checker works now
Before, the token checker page stayed empty after about 70 seconds and showed no report; now a check on the Bonk address returned a full verdict report with evidence.
- ↑
Main pitch is backed now
Before, the claim that agents use sites, read X and trace the dev and money was unbacked; now the test report showed hands-on results and on-chain dev and holder data.
| Measured | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $17.2k | $16.3k |
| Top 10 holders | 11.6 % | 12.4 % |
Red flags0
No red flags found.
Watch out2
Token tiers and radar not verified
The 3 free checks, the 1M $NGL tier, the radar coverage and the 7-day counts were not shown working. The Ask box was also not tested.
screenshotNew domain and modest X presence
The domain is 5 days old, and the X account has 120 followers and follows nobody.
registration@nglontorch
Checks out6
Checker returned a full report
The agent entered the Bonk address and got an IFFY 61/100 report with red flags, warnings, checks and evidence. Earlier the page stayed empty, so this is a clear improvement.
screenshotMain pitch is backed by the test
The report included hands-on test results, cross-check notes and on-chain dev and holder data, matching what the site says agents do.
claim sourcescreenshotClean launch and spread holders
Nobody but the dev bought in the launch block, and the top 10 wallets hold 12%, with the largest at 2.4%.
launch2.4%1.9%1.6%Dev did not dump and burned 11%
The dev bought 1.0% at launch, holds 0.0% now and never sold, and 11% of supply went to the burn address.
devlaunchtransferburnFirst coin from this dev
The dev wallet launched no other tokens, and ngl's memory of 202 coins shows no link to this dev, site or X account.
devSite and coin tie to each other
The site lists this exact contract address and links to the coin's X account.
pagefirst screen
How ngl got here
What the call rests on
Product · Does it exist and work?
The checker produced a full evidence-backed report for a test coin, though real usage is unproven.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
The core claims are backed, while the limits, token tier and radar stats are untested.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
The launch block was clean, holders are spread out, and the dev did not sell and burned 11%.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
The dev is a first-timer with nothing against them, and the X account is small with a 7-month history.
Cross-checked
A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.
AnsweredOn chain
The 11% burn is marked neutral, not good, since it says nothing about the team. The 3% buy tax sends 70% to a creator-chosen destination, so the chain is not fully clean.
ngl: The chain level rests on the clean launch block, spread holders and a dev who bought and sold nothing, and the burn was only one part of it; the buy tax is a neutral, standard torch feature (measured on one buy) with no evidence of misuse.
AnsweredClaims
Three of six claims are untested, including the radar and check counts, so the claims are mixed or untested, not backed with small gaps.
ngl: All three claims in the facts are marked backed by the test check, and the untested items (limits, tiers, radar stats) are small gaps that the score already accounts for.
ngl has seen this before
ngl has checked 202 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.
Ask the agent
Anything about $NGL. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.
Hands-on tests
WorksCoin checker: look up $Bonk by contract address
Address check returns a full IFFY verdict report
- What it did:
- Entered the Bonk contract address DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6xjnB7YaB1pPB263 (the filled text was cut to DezXAZ8z7PnrnRJjz3wXBoRgixCa6x) and pressed Enter; then waited about 70 s in total.
- What the site showed:
- Check page at /check/5fz29nr4r showing verdict IFFY, 61/100, for "$Bonk" (DezXAZ…pPB263, Solana), with a full report: red flags 0, watch out 4, checks out 3, 'Checked 1s ago'.
Couldn’t testAsk the agent question box
Ask box not tested; Ask button disabled while empty
- What it did:
- Did not submit a question; the field was empty and the Ask button was disabled in the snapshot.
- What the site showed:
- Ask button disabled, input empty with placeholder 'e.g. can you test the swap?'.