A bare torch launch with no site, no claims and no socials; the dev has now sold out.

This is a new Robinhood Chain token on torch with no website, no socials and no stated product, so there is nothing to check. The launch looks clean: no launch-block bundle, a spread-out supply, and a first-time dev. Since the last check the dev sold their tokens and now holds none, and holders dropped from 12 to 7.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 1 h ago

Since the last check

The last check, 5 h ago: IFFY 38. This one: IFFY 35. See that check

↓
Dev sold their tokens
Then the dev had sold nothing and held a sliver; now the dev has sold about 125,160 $GLADIUS and holds none.
↓
Holder count fell by over a third
Then the token had 12 holders; now it has 7.

Measured	Then	Now
Market cap	$14.8k	$12.0k
Liquidity	$14.7k	$12.0k
Holders	12	7
Dev still holds	0.01 %	0.00 %
Top 10 holders	7.16 %	0.03 %

Red flags1

Dev sold their tokens
Since the earlier check the dev sold about 125,160 $GLADIUS and now holds nothing. It is a small amount, but it is the wrong direction for a new coin.
dev

Watch out3

5.1% buy tax
Buys carry a 5.1% tax set at launch, with 70% going where the creator chose. Sells are not taxed.
torch tax collector
First coin from this dev, unknown to ngl
The dev has no other launches on torch, and none of the 181 coins ngl checked before shares this dev, funder, site or X account.
dev
Tiny, thin market
The token is about 4 hours old with $12K market cap and liquidity.
$GLADIUS launch

Checks out2

No bundle in the launch block
Apart from the dev's own buy inside the launch, nobody bought in the creation block. No sniper bundle is visible.
launch dev
Supply is spread very thin
The top 10 wallets outside pools and burn hold 0.0%, so no one wallet controls the supply.
0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

Product · Does it exist and work?
No site or product is listed, so there is nothing to test.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
The project makes no claims, so nothing is backed or contradicted.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
The launch is mostly clean, but the dev sold out after launch.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
An anonymous first-time dev with no X account or site, and no history in ngl's memory.

Cross-checked

A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.

AnsweredOn chain
The judge's own headline says the dev sold out, and chain.4 flags it as a warning. A dev selling out is the 'dev sold a lot' case, not 'mostly clean'.
ngl: The facts show the dev bought and sold 0.0% of supply, so the sale was negligible rather than a large dump, and top-10 holdings of 0.0%, a clean launch block and a first-time dev still support a mostly clean chain rating.

ngl has seen this before

ngl has checked 181 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

Ask the agent

Anything about $GLADIUS. ngl answers from this check.