ngl
LEGIT

74 / 100

± 0 since last

$SNTL

0x2da8…08cbd0· Robinhood ChainAll 2 checks

ngl, not gonna lie

The read-only chain tool works and the dev burned supply and sold nothing, but the project is very new.

The Sentinel site reads the SNTL contract live on Robinhood Chain and returns real data. The launch block was clean, the dev holds 0%, sold nothing and has burned 6.1% of supply. The domain and X account are only about a week old, and the watchlist and Guard burn tool were not tested this time. The market cap and liquidity drop says nothing about whether the project is real.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 1 h ago

Since the last check

The last check, 3 days ago: LEGIT 74. This one: LEGIT 74. See that check

  • ↓

    Market cap fell by about three quarters

    Market cap was about $40.5K at the first check and is about $10.7K now.

  • ↓

    Liquidity roughly halved

    Liquidity was about $18.7K then and is about $9.6K now.

  • ↑

    Dev burned more of the supply

    The dev had sent 3.0% of supply to the burn address then and has sent 6.1% now, while still holding 0% and selling nothing.

MeasuredThenNow
Market cap$40.5k$10.7k
Liquidity$18.7k$9.6k
Holders242193
Top 10 holders30.4 %28.2 %
X followers229299

Red flags0

No red flags found.

Watch out2

  • Very young X account and domain

    The domain and the X account are both about 8 days old. The X account has 299 followers and none of the sampled followers were empty accounts. Engagement is modest.

    registration@sentinelhood@sentinelhood@sentinelhood
  • Watchlist and Guard burn tool not tested

    The agent ran out of steps before submitting the watchlist or Guard forms. The Pons launch list does show live data.

    screenshot

Checks out5

  • Inspector reads the SNTL contract live

    The agent got the contract result for the full SNTL address: bytecode 3,248 bytes, a block number, and token data (Pons v2, Uniswap v4). The site works as described, reading real on-chain data.

    screenshotclaim source
  • Dev sold nothing and burned more supply

    The dev wallet bought 3.0%, sold 0%, holds 0%, and has now sent 6.1% of supply to the burn address, up from 3.0% before.

    devtransferburntoken
  • Clean launch block

    Apart from the dev's buy inside the launch transaction, nobody bought in the launch block. No sign of bundling.

    launchdev
  • Holder spread is moderate

    The top 10 wallets hold 28% and the largest holds 8.7%, excluding pools and burned tokens. That is not a heavy concentration.

    8.7%3.4%2.5%2.3%
  • Real code behind the project

    The project's own repo has 57 commits and was pushed to 13 hours ago, though it has one contributor and no stars. It builds on the established aeonfun repos.

    sentinelhood/robinhood-sentinelaeonfun/aeonaeonfun/univ4-hooks

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

  • Product · Does it exist and work?

    The inspector reads the contract on chain and the launch list shows live data; the Guard and watchlist were not tried.

  • Claims · Are its claims backed?

    The one claim, a live read-only chain reader, is backed by the contract read.

  • On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet

    Clean launch block, dev holds 0% and sold nothing, 6.1% burned, top 10 hold 28%.

  • Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory

    There is a real repo and active X account, but both are new and the dev has no history in ngl's memory.

Cross-checked

A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong. It found nothing to object to.

ngl has seen this before

ngl has checked 193 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

Ask the agent

Anything about $SNTL. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.

Hands-on tests

  • WorksInspector: read the $SNTL contract address

    Inspector reads the SNTL contract on chain

    What it did:
    Filled the address field fld1 with 0x2da80b9d1bc1b323693c80c76eb4 (a truncated value, 42 chars expected) and pressed Enter / Inspect several times. Then the page showed the Contract 0x2da8…cbd0 result for the full address that was already in the box.
    What the site showed:
    Contract 0x2da8…cbd0: Balance 0.000000 ETH, Bytecode 3,248 bytes, Nonce 1, Read at block 96,450,622. TOKEN Sentinel SNTL: Pons v2 launch, Uniswap v4 · liquidity locked, Trading cost 4% (1% base + 3% creator tax), Total supply 942,407,354.5779.
    Screenshot: Inspector reads the SNTL contract on chain
  • Couldn’t testWatchlist: save an address

    Watchlist save not tested

    What it did:
    Not tested in the final steps; the form fields (Label, Address) were visible but I did not submit them.
    What the site showed:
    Watchlist empty: 'No watched addresses yet.'
    Screenshot: Watchlist save not tested
  • WorksPons launches list and Check buttons

    Launch list shows recent Pons tokens

    What it did:
    Viewed the live launches list (no Check click recorded).
    What the site showed:
    List of recent Pons launches with tax, curve and ETH pair, e.g. ADPT tax 2%, times like '5m ago'.
    Screenshot: Launch list shows recent Pons tokens
  • Couldn’t testSentinel Guard: build burn for a token

    Guard burn form not submitted

    What it did:
    Not submitted; the 'Your Pons token address' field (fld4) was empty.
    What the site showed:
    'No guarded tokens yet. Be the first.'
    Screenshot: Guard burn form not submitted
New checkBrowse all checks