ngl
IFFY

47 / 100

↓ 3 since last

$mint

tybY2L…x3mint· SolanaAll 2 checks

ngl, not gonna lie

Sign-in works, but the revenue share and mint-for-losses claims are unproven, and an exploit hit the casino.

The site connects a Solana wallet and shows revshare figures, but the agent could not see a claim or payout work. The project's own X update admits an exploit, so "funds are safe" is contradicted. One wallet still holds mint authority and no on-chain program is named for the revenue share, buyback or minting. Holders are fairly spread and no freeze authority exists.

Ask the agent Watch

Checked 1 h ago

Since the last check

The last check, 1 h ago: IFFY 50. This one: IFFY 47. See that check

  • ↓

    Liquidity fell by more than half

    Liquidity was about $82.5K then and is about $37.9K now, a drop of roughly 54%, while market cap stayed near $570-590K.

  • ↓

    The "funds are safe" claim is now contradicted

    Then the claim that funds were safe after the exploit had nothing backing it; now the project's own X incident update says 3 accounts exploited a bug for about 6 minutes and wins had to be reversed.

MeasuredThenNow
Liquidity$82.5k$37.9k

Red flags2

  • Exploit admitted by the project's own X post

    The X incident update says 3 accounts exploited a bug for about 6 minutes and wins had to be reversed. That contradicts the claim that the exploit was prevented and funds are safe.

    claim source@mintdottop
  • Mint authority is still held by one wallet

    5Yix…Un7g can mint more tokens. The project says losses mint $MINT to players, but names no program that does this.

    mintmint authoritypage

Watch out4

  • No on-chain product or wallet is named

    The site, description and X bio name no program or wallet for the revshare, buyback, burn or minting. The 30% revenue share could not be checked.

    page
  • Launch bundle mostly sold

    29 wallets bought 8.4% in the launch block and now hold 1.0%, having sold 7.4%. That is selling pressure that has already happened.

    launch8P6M…EMdo7rzH…kw3kGo9B…ZCc8
  • Wallet sign-in works, but no payout was seen

    The test wallet connected and signed a sign-in message, and no KYC step appeared. The agent ran out of actions before finding a claim or stake action, and the pending $MINT showed 0.00.

    wallet request
  • New X account and domain, no history

    The X account is 4 days old with 652 followers, and the domain was registered 4 days ago. The sampled followers look real, and ngl has not seen this dev or site before.

    @mintdottopregistration

Checks out1

  • Holder spread is fairly clean

    The top 10 wallets hold 27% and the largest holds 5.9%. The dev holds 0.0% and freeze authority is revoked.

    5.9%4.2%4.0%2.4%

How ngl got here

What the call rests on

  • Product · Does it exist and work?

    Sign-in and the revshare page work, but no claim, payout or casino flow was seen working.

  • Claims · Are its claims backed?

    Only the no-KYC sign-in is backed; the safety claim is contradicted and the mint and buyback claims are unbacked.

  • On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet

    Holders are spread out and the dev holds nothing, but the bundle sold most of its share and mint authority is still active.

  • Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory

    Judge ignores real presence signals: followers are clean, the site links back to the X account, and 5 of 16 CA posters have 1K+ followers.

Cross-checked

A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.

  • AnsweredClaims

    A key claim is contradicted: the site's 'funds are safe, exploit prevented' claim is refuted by the incident update. The rubric makes that level 0, not 1.

    ngl: The safety claim is contradicted, but other claims are backed or merely unproven, so a mixed claims picture fits level 1 and does not warrant level 0.

  • AnsweredOn chain

    The launch bundle bought 8.4% and has sold 7.4%, about 88% of its share, which is a bundle dump. Level 0 applies, not mixed.

    ngl: The bundle held only 8.4% and sold 7.4%, which is a modest warning, while top holders are spread (27%, largest 5.9%) and the dev holds nothing, so the chain picture is mixed and not an outright dump.

  • AcceptedTeam

    Judge ignores real presence signals: followers are clean, the site links back to the X account, and 5 of 16 CA posters have 1K+ followers.

ngl has seen this before

ngl has checked 206 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

Ask the agent

Anything about $mint. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.

Screenshots

Screenshot from the checkScreenshot from the check
New checkBrowse all checks