70 / 100
± 0 since last$TORCH
0x0000…ed1111· Robinhood ChainAll 7 checks
ngl, not gonna lie
Torch looks like a real launchpad with a clean launch, but the agent could not finish a launch to confirm it.
The coin is the platform token of a launchpad on Robinhood Chain. It has an established X account, a clean launch block and a dev who holds nothing. The agent reached the app and signed in with a message only, but got stuck on a key-export dialog and never finished a launch. Some fee and revenue claims could not be confirmed or are slightly off.
Since the last check
The last check, 28 h ago: LEGIT 70. This one: LEGIT 70. See that check
The project looks the same as last time. These numbers moved:
| Measured | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $9.9M | $11.0M |
| Liquidity | $2.2M | $2.4M |
| Holders | 3,672 | 4,001 |
| Top 10 holders | 37.6 % | 37.0 % |
Red flags0
No red flags found.
Watch out4
Main product flow not completed
The agent opened the terminal, accepted the disclaimer, reached the Launch page and signed in. It then timed out repeatedly on a key-export checkbox, so no token creation was seen working.
wallet requestFee split backed, but the 1% fee claim is off
The 70/30 creator/protocol split matches the measured tax. The claim of a 1% fee on all trades does not match TORCH's 2.0% buy tax with untaxed sells.
claim sourcetorch tax collectorBurn is real, per-trade burns unproven
3.42% of supply sits at the burn address, which backs the claimed 3.12%. Nothing shows buybacks on every trade or the revenue share to holders.
burn address, 3.42%claim sourceModerate holder concentration
The top 10 holders hold 37%, though this count includes pools and lockers.
token
Checks out4
Wallet only asked to sign in
The site asked the test wallet for one sign-in message and nothing that moves funds.
wallet requestClean launch, dev holds nothing
No one else bought in the launch block, and the dev wallet holds no tokens and never bought any.
launchdevFirst coin from this dev, no known ties
The dev launched no other tokens, and none of the 191 coins ngl checked before shares its wallet, site, X or Telegram.
devX account looks established and organic
About 5,000 followers, 10 months old, none of the sampled followers are empty accounts, and posts get steady engagement.
@Torchpaddotfun@Torchpaddotfun@Torchpaddotfun@Torchpaddotfun
How ngl got here
What the call rests on
Product · Does it exist and work?
The app and launch page exist, but the agent could not finish a launch, so the main feature was not seen working.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
The fee split and burn are backed, the 1% fee claim is contradicted, and the revenue share and daily figures are unbacked.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
No launch-block bundle and the dev holds nothing; top-10 concentration is moderate.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
The X account is established and organic, but the team is not otherwise known and ngl has no history on it.
Cross-checked
A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.
AnsweredClaims
The judge calls the 1% trade-fee claim contradicted but still scores claims 2. A contradicted core fee claim meets the level-0 rule.
ngl: The contradiction is only about the fee rate (2% on buys, none on sells, versus 1% on both), while the fee mechanism, the 70/30 split and the burn are all backed, so the claims are mixed rather than fabricated.
ngl has seen this before
ngl has checked 191 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.
Ask the agent
Anything about $TORCH. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.
Screenshots
