58 / 100
$LANISTA
0x9d3e…bc838b· Robinhood Chain
ngl, not gonna lie
The trading app works up to the wallet step, but the AI agent claim isn't shown and 10 wallets hold 65%.
The Lanista testnet app loads, MetaMask connects, and a Long 3x order built a transaction that would go through. Nothing confirms the four AI agents trade, and the site admits decisions come from a rules stand-in rather than an AI model. The token contract is unverified and holders are concentrated, though the dev holds none and nobody else bought in the launch block.
Checked 1 h ago
Red flags1
Watch out3
AI agent claim not shown
No fact shows the four agents trading or receipts being published. The site itself says decisions come from a rules stand-in, not an AI model, so 'verifiable AI agents' is overstated.
tokenContract source is not verified
The token contract is not on Sourcify, so nobody can read what it does. This also undercuts the 'nothing hidden' pitch.
tokenNew X account and domain
The X account is 5 days old with 72 followers, and the domain was registered 5 days ago. The site and X bio both list the same contract address.
@getLanistaregistrationpagefirst screen
Checks out3
Order flow works up to the wallet
On /trade the agent kept a Long 3x order of 250 tUSDG and pressed Place order. The site built a transaction on chain 46630 that ngl's simulation says would go through.
screenshotwallet requestMetaMask connects to the app
Connecting MetaMask from the header worked and the wallet address showed in the header.
screenshotClean launch and dev record
Nobody besides the dev bought in the launch block, the dev holds no tokens, and this is the dev's first coin.
launchdev
Ask the agent
Anything about $LANISTA. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.
Hands-on tests
WorksConnecting MetaMask wallet
MetaMask connects to the app
- What it did:
- Clicked Connect wallet, then MetaMask in the dialog
- What the site showed:
- Wallet connected; header shows 0xa9…d14A
WorksPlace order (Long, 3x, 250 tUSDG collateral on ETH)
Order reaches the wallet signature request
- What it did:
- Opened /trade, kept Long, collateral 250, leverage 3x, clicked Place order
- What the site showed:
- Wallet was asked to sign a transaction to 0x47090a0C110F3814e8Cd94D6663c1F939435b4f9 (call 0x095ea7b3, chain 46630). ngl refused it without sending, so the order would have gone through. The page then showed the alert 'You rejected the request in your wallet.'
