50 / 100
± 0 since last$SCROOGE
0x4da3…b41bfd· Robinhood ChainAll 4 checks
ngl, not gonna lie
The site is a broad trading front end, but we never saw it quote or swap, and the savings claims have no backing.
Scrooge has a large, working-looking site and a real-looking X account with no empty-follower padding. The agent could not complete wallet connection or see a quote, so the main claim (best price across venues) was not seen working. The launch was clean and the dev holds nothing, but the headline savings and fee figures are unbacked.
Since the last check
The last check, 33 h ago: IFFY 50. This one: IFFY 50. See that check
The project looks the same as last time. These numbers moved:
| Measured | Then | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $128.6k | $119.0k |
| Liquidity | $33.3k | $31.5k |
| Top 10 holders | 45.9 % | 46.0 % |
Red flags0
No red flags found.
Watch out6
Router never seen quoting or swapping
The agent opened the swap page, tried MetaMask, and entered 0.01, but no tests were recorded and no quote or transaction appeared. The core 'best deal across venues' claim stayed untested.
claim sourceSavings and fee comparisons have no backing
The claims of $9.7k saved and $0.72 vs $10.02 fees per $1,000 are not supported by any checked fact. The launchpad 60% creator share and liquidity lock claim is also unbacked.
claim sourceDev holds nothing and burned some supply
The dev wallet holds no tokens and burned 1.4% of supply. 0.5% went to a wallet that passed it on without a direct sale being seen.
devtransferburntransferHolder concentration is moderate
The top 10 wallets hold 46%, including pools and lockers, and the wallets could not be listed.
tokenX account looks organic but is young
871 followers, none of the 200 newest are empty accounts, and posts get about 38 likes. The account is 28 days old and the builder (@0xanser) is not verified.
@scroogexchange@scroogexchange@scroogexchange@scroogexchangeYoung domain, shows the correct CA
scrooge.exchange was registered 30 days ago and lists this exact contract address.
registrationpagefirst screen
Checks out1
Clean launch block
Apart from the dev buy, nobody bought in the launch block, so there was no sniper bundle at launch.
launch
How ngl got here
What the call rests on
Product · Does it exist and work?
A broad site exists, but the swap flow was not seen producing a quote or transaction.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
Savings, fee and launchpad claims are unbacked or untested.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
Clean launch block and the dev holds nothing; moderate concentration and one pass-through transfer.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
The X account looks real and organic, but the builder is not verified and there is no track record.
Cross-checked
A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong. It found nothing to object to.
ngl has seen this before
ngl has checked 161 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.

