70 / 100
$KILTR
0x985f…1123ad· Robinhood Chain
ngl, not gonna lie
The swap works up to the chain, but the revenue claims have nothing behind them yet and the team is unknown.
Kiltr's swap page connected a wallet, quoted KILTR, and built a transaction that ngl's simulation says would succeed. The launch looks clean: no other buyers in the launch block, and the dev holds little and has not sold. Only the swap was tested, and DefiLlama shows $0 fees and revenue, so the staking and perps payout claims are unbacked. The team has little public presence.
Red flags0
No red flags found.
Watch out6
No fees or revenue recorded yet
DefiLlama shows $0 fees and $0 revenue all time. The claims about staker revenue share and perps LP payouts have nothing behind them so far.
DefiLlama: Kiltrclaim sourceSwap quote has very high price impact
A 0.01 ETH trade moved the pool price by 21%, which fits thin liquidity of about $39K. The site warned about it and required a second tap.
screenshot$KILTRlaunchTop holders are moderately concentrated
The top 10 wallets hold 31%, and the largest single wallet holds 8.2%.
8.2%3.1%3.0%2.9%Dev sent tokens to two other wallets
About 2.5% and 2.0% went to other wallets, which still hold and have not sold. One of them, 0x8d…7df2, is the same address the swap transaction goes to, so it may be a protocol contract.
devtransferreceivedtransferYoung project, small X following, no history
The X account and domain are about 35 days old. The account has 159 followers and posts get about 1 like. ngl has not seen this dev, site or account before.
@KiltrProtocol@KiltrProtocol@KiltrProtocol@KiltrProtocolMost product claims were not tested
Pools, baskets, Fusions and perps were not tried, and the 'first multi-asset AMM on Robinhood Chain' claim cannot be checked.
claim source
Checks out2
Swap builds a transaction that would succeed
The agent connected MetaMask, picked KILTR, entered 0.01 ETH and confirmed the high-impact warning. The site then asked the wallet to sign a contract call, and ngl's simulation says it would go through.
screenshotwallet requestLaunch block was clean
Nobody except the dev bought in the block that created the token. The dev holds 1.2%, and bought and sold nothing after launch.
launchdev
How ngl got here
What the call rests on
Product · Does it exist and work?
The swap works up to the wallet signature and simulates as successful, but other features were not tested and there is no recorded usage.
Claims · Are its claims backed?
The token and routing claims are backed, but the revenue-share claims are unbacked and several others are untested.
On chain · Holders, bundles, the dev wallet
The dev sent 4.3% to two unknown wallets, and the 1.8% wallet is the same address the site's swap transaction is sent to. That link is not in the judge's reasoning.
Team · X account, dev history, ngl’s memory
A new anonymous X account with few followers and no earlier history in ngl's memory.
Cross-checked
A second agent read the same evidence and tried to prove this call wrong.
AcceptedOn chain
The dev sent 4.3% to two unknown wallets, and the 1.8% wallet is the same address the site's swap transaction is sent to. That link is not in the judge's reasoning.
ngl has seen this before
ngl has checked 188 coins. None of them shares this coin’s dev wallet, the wallet that funded it, its website, X account, Telegram or logo.
Ask the agent
Anything about $KILTR. ngl answers from this check, or goes back to the site and tries what you ask.
Hands-on tests
WorksSwap flow: connect wallet, pick $KILTR, enter amount, submit
Swap reaches the wallet signature request
- What it did:
- Opened /app/swap, connected MetaMask via Connect wallet, selected the official KILTR token (0x985f…23AD) from the token list, entered 0.01 ETH in the pay field, then pressed the swap button twice (first tap 'Price impact over 10% — tap again to confirm', then 'Swap').
- What the site showed:
- Quote showed 4161520.595617 KILTR for 0.01 ETH, route ETH → KILTR, pool fee 0.3%, price impact 21.27% with 'Very high price impact — this trade moves the pool price by more than 10%.' After the second tap the site asked the wallet to sign a transaction to 0x8d1addff942c185e81848a19203b994f5cf07df2, value 0.01, call 0x52bbbe29, chain 4663. ngl refused it after simulating; the page then displayed 'U
WorksConnect wallet (MetaMask)
MetaMask connects to the swap page
- What it did:
- Clicked Connect wallet, then MetaMask in the wallet list.
- What the site showed:
- Header shows the test wallet 0xa9…d14A with 100 ETH on Robinhood Chain.
